Watershed Data Report

This report was created with the free Global Watersheds web app on . Creative Commons License BY 4.0.

Contents

  1. Political Boundaries
  2. Population
  3. Land Cover
  4. Hydrology
  5. GRACE Terrestrial Water Storage
  6. Irrigation
  7. Dams
  8. Longest River
  9. Topography
  10. Endangered Species
  11. References

This report is for the watershed with an outlet near 30°04'44"S, 51°16'22"W, or (-30.079, -51.273), with a drainage area of around 82,500 km².

Political Boundaries

The watershed is entirely within Brazil, and in two states, as shown in Table 2.

Table 2. States in the watershed.

State Area (km²) Percent of watershed
Rio Grande do Sul 82,500 100%
Santa Catarina 22 0%

Data on political boundaries comes from Natural Earth, https://www.naturalearthdata.com.

Population

The watershed has an estimated population of 6,970,000 in the year 2020. Figure 1 shows how population has changed from 1990 to 2020. The population grew at an average rate of 0.9% per year over this time period.

Figure 1. Estimated watershed population from 1990 to 2020.

Population data comes from GlobPop, Global Gridded Population Estimates, created by researchers at Beijing Normal University (Liu 2024).

Human population growth can affect water quality via increased pollution from households, industry, and agriculture. Further, land use and land cover change associated with population growth can have a major impact on watersheds (see the next section of this report).

Land Cover

The most common land cover type in the watershed is tree cover, covering 28,600 km² in 2020. More detailed information about land cover and how it has changed is shown in Table 3 and Figure 2 below. Pairs of bars represent the area for each land cover type in the years 2000 and 2020.

Figure 2. Land cover in the watershed.

Table 3. Land cover in the watershed.

Land Cover Type Area in 2000, km² Area in 2020, km²   Change
Tree cover 29,500 28,600 -2%
Dense short vegetation 30,900 22,000 -28%
Cropland 13,300 20,800 55%
Built-up 3,890 6,640 70%
Wetland + dense short vegetation 2,670 2,220 -17%
Open surface water 1,150 1,180 2%
Wetland + tree cover 1,140 1,140 0%

Land cover data comes from the GLAD: Global Land Cover and Land Use Change, 2000-2020 (Popatov et al. 2022). This dataset, created by researchers at the University of Maryland, is available online here. Classification is based on satellite imagery from Landsat and machine learning tools.

Land cover change can profoundly influence watershed hydrology and water quality. Urbanization and development can increase the impervious cover, causing more water to run off rather than infiltrate into the ground. This can decrease groundwater recharge and river baseflows, or the flows that occur during dry times. Deforestation and agricultural development are often accompanied by an increase in soil erosion and sediment loads. Other land use types are associated with water pollution. For example, agriculture can increase loads of pesticides and nutrients (nitrogen and phosphorus) from fertilizers. Urbanization and industrialization can cause contamination from a wide range of chemicals used in households and industry.

Hydrology

The average annual precipitation over the watershed is 1,589 mm/year. (Precipitation includes all forms of water, including snow and rain.) Some of this water leaves the watershed surface via evaporation and transpiration, or the loss of water from plants. Annual evapotranspiration is estimated at 945 mm/year. The basin climatology, or the monthly average precipitation and evapotranspiration, is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4. Watershed climatology: monthly average precipitation and evapotranspiration over the watershed.

Precipitation data comes from WorldClim, a global gridded dataset by researchers at the University of East Anglia (Harris et al. 2020). This dataset is based on downscaling and bias-correcting the CRU-TS dataset (Fick and Hijmans 2017), which is based on a large collection of station observations that span 1901–2018.

Evapotranspiration is even more difficult to estimate than precipitation. Here, we use a dataset, GLEAM v3.6B, which combines modeling and remote sensing data (Martens et al. 2017; Miralles et al. 2011).

It is difficult to estimate water cycle variables over large areas. So you should keep in mind that these estimates are uncertain (not perfect).

Terrestrial Water Storage Anomaly

The GRACE satellites provide information about changes in the amount of water over different locations on the Earth. Figure 3 shows the average terrestrial water storage anomaly over the watershed.

🖱️Mouse wheel to zoom Click & drag to pan 📱Pinch to zoom on mobile

Figure 3. GRACE terrestrial water storage anomaly from 2002 to 2025.

The GRACE satellites make highly accurate measurements of the Earth's gravitational field, and provide measurements of changes in the mass of water on a monthly time scale. These measurements do not tell us how much water there is in a region, but rather, how it the amount of water has changed compared to a baseline. The measurement includes all forms of water, including water in rivers, lakes, and reservoirs, soil moisture, groundwater, glaciers, snow, and ice. For an introduction to GRACE, see the section of my PhD thesis on Remote Sensing of the Water Cycle.

The total amount of water in the watershed appears to be trending upwards at a rate of 2.1 cm per decade (P < 0.01). This P-value suggests that the observed trend is statistically significant; it is unlikely the trend is due to random chance.

GRACE Terrestrial Water Storage Anomaly data is from the Center for Space Research at the University of Texas, Austin (Save et al. 2016, 2022).

Irrigation

The watershed had about 2247.2 km² of land equipped for irrigation in 2005. This is about 2.7% of the watershed. Figure 5 shows the development of irrigated area from 1900 to 2005. These estimates are based on a global dataset published by an international team of researchers (Siebert et al. 2015).

Figure 5. Area equipped for irrigation in the watershed from 1900 to 2005

Irrigation brings many benefits for growing crops. In arid regions, it enables production where it would be otherwise impossible. In humid regions, irrigation can increase crop quality and yield, and provide more certainty against unpredictable climate. Yet, the expansion of irrigation can have impacts on watersheds that need to be carefully managed.

Increased irrigation usually requires more water to be withdrawn from rivers, lakes, or groundwater sources, which can reduce streamflow and alter natural flow patterns. This reduced flow can harm aquatic ecosystems and diminish the water available downstream for other uses. Irrigation often introduces fertilizers and pesticides into the watershed, and may increase soil erosion and sediment transport. When nutrients run off into rivers and streams, they can lead to nutrient pollution, algal blooms, and eutrophication. This plus chemical pesticides and herbicides negatively impacts aquatic life and water quality for human uses.

Dams

This watershed contains 421 dams identified in the Global Dam Watch database, with a total storage capacity of 7,030 million m³.

Information on these dams is listed in Table 4. The number and size of dams in a watershed is one measure of hydromodification, or how much the natural hydrologic cycle is influenced by human activities.

Table 4. Dams in the watershed. Unknown or missing data shown with a dash.

Dam Name Reservoir Name River Main Use Year Dam Height (m) Capacity (10⁶ m³) Latitude Longitude URL
-29.031 -51.521
-29.609 -51.951
-28.615 -51.403
São Paulo Uruguay Hydroelectricity -28.769 -51.836
Passo de Meio Taquari Hydroelectricity -28.807 -50.613
-29.128 -53.320
-29.122 -53.366
-28.941 -51.773
-29.924 -53.415
Autódromo Uruguay Hydroelectricity -28.828 -51.842
-28.936 -51.460
-28.891 -51.456
-30.093 -52.502
-29.947 -51.895
-28.560 -51.402
Passo Real Real Jacui Hydroelectricity Built 1973 58.0 3671.0 -29.014 -53.188
Itauba Jacui Built 1978 90.0 600.0 -29.259 -53.236
Dona Francisca Jacui Built 2001 47.0 335.0 -29.448 -53.288
Ernestina Jacui Built 1954 13.0 258.0 -28.555 -52.543
144.4 -30.232 -52.928
Castro Alves Das Antas Hydroelectricity Built 2008 48.0 126.0 -29.005 -51.383 link
Quatorze de Julho Das Antas Hydroelectricity Built 2009 33.0 55.0 -29.066 -51.675
53.4 -29.074 -53.209
43.8 -29.328 -50.615
Capigui Capigui Built 1950 22.0 42.0 -28.350 -52.215
30.7 -29.299 -50.568
Built 2013 30.1 -29.037 -50.988
Built before 1985 30.1 -30.029 -53.041
29.2 -29.314 -50.674
Pezzi Hydroelectricity Built 2012 25.6 -28.793 -50.565
Built 1986 21.3 -30.486 -53.093
21.0 -30.136 -53.694
Criúva Palanquinho Hydroelectricity Built 2010 19.8 -28.965 -50.798
18.4 -29.915 -53.564
18.0 -29.920 -53.186
14.5 -29.981 -52.858
12.5 -30.174 -52.724
12.3 -30.158 -52.520
Built before 1985 12.1 -30.028 -53.730
11.0 -30.108 -53.193
10.9 -30.244 -54.310
Built 1988 10.7 -29.914 -54.103
10.6 -30.081 -53.682
Built 1992 10.4 -30.496 -54.332
10.4 -30.103 -53.773
10.1 -30.078 -53.769
Built before 1985 9.9 -30.265 -54.115
Built before 1985 9.6 -30.010 -53.199
Built before 1985 9.6 -30.228 -52.898
9.4 -29.766 -52.647
Built 1998 9.2 -30.500 -54.445
9.0 -30.090 -53.798
Built 2010 9.0 -28.902 -50.811
8.8 -30.192 -53.200
Built 1994 8.7 -30.419 -54.201
Built 1993 8.7 -30.055 -54.203
8.7 -29.775 -52.126
8.6 -30.360 -54.412
8.1 -29.744 -53.194
8.1 -30.107 -54.082
7.9 -30.404 -54.224
Built 2002 7.8 -30.435 -54.506
7.7 -30.109 -53.218
7.6 -30.031 -53.606
7.4 -30.295 -54.186
7.4 -30.153 -53.008
7.3 -30.074 -54.036
7.1 -30.010 -52.038
7.0 -30.106 -54.003
Built 1989 6.9 -30.228 -54.194
Built 1997 6.9 -30.031 -53.670
Built before 1985 6.9 -30.022 -54.061
Built before 1985 6.7 -30.086 -52.623
6.7 -30.030 -53.945
6.6 -30.089 -53.986
Built before 1985 6.6 -30.036 -53.311
6.5 -30.126 -54.029
6.5 -30.003 -53.114
6.5 -30.057 -53.848
6.5 -29.833 -52.780
6.5 -30.160 -53.723
6.4 -30.126 -54.190
6.3 -30.081 -54.174
6.3 -29.672 -53.784
Built before 1985 6.3 -30.115 -51.948
6.2 -30.047 -53.681
Built before 1985 6.1 -29.903 -54.174
6.1 -29.799 -52.772
6.0 -30.027 -52.214
6.0 -30.079 -51.477
Built 1988 6.0 -29.935 -53.832
5.9 -30.091 -52.709
5.9 -30.181 -54.223
5.9 -30.058 -53.084
5.9 -30.478 -53.181
Built before 1985 5.9 -30.216 -52.799
Built before 1985 5.9 -30.168 -54.311
5.8 -30.074 -52.072
5.8 -30.081 -53.177
5.7 -29.907 -54.030
Built before 1985 5.7 -30.225 -53.149
5.6 -30.491 -54.491
5.6 -29.907 -53.956
5.5 -30.044 -53.168
5.5 -30.448 -54.512
5.5 -30.277 -54.406
5.4 -29.793 -53.015
5.4 -30.215 -54.282
5.4 -30.187 -52.985
Built before 1985 5.3 -30.066 -52.660
5.3 -29.978 -53.697
5.3 -30.103 -53.394
5.3 -30.252 -53.235
5.3 -30.204 -53.019
5.2 -30.144 -54.057
5.2 -29.924 -53.603
5.1 -30.043 -54.071
5.1 -30.292 -54.428
5.1 -30.170 -52.173
5.0 -30.111 -52.953
5.0 -30.074 -52.016
5.0 -30.392 -54.408
4.9 -30.199 -53.327
4.9 -30.178 -52.593
4.9 -30.087 -53.384
4.9 -30.073 -53.722
4.8 -30.149 -52.785
4.8 -29.896 -52.840
4.8 -30.173 -53.206
4.8 -30.149 -53.791
4.8 -30.168 -54.069
4.8 -30.179 -54.260
4.8 -29.932 -53.511
4.7 -30.038 -54.012
4.7 -29.835 -54.203
Built before 1985 4.6 -30.025 -53.962
Built before 1985 4.6 -29.752 -52.902
4.6 -29.991 -54.020
4.6 -30.004 -53.270
4.6 -30.151 -54.199
Built before 1985 4.5 -30.061 -53.156
4.5 -30.215 -53.053
Built 1987 4.5 -30.270 -54.433
4.5 -30.144 -53.207
Built 1988 4.5 -30.440 -53.152
4.5 -30.461 -53.184
4.5 -30.100 -53.307
Built before 1985 4.5 -29.896 -52.878
4.5 -30.069 -53.849
Built before 1985 4.5 -29.840 -52.990
4.5 -30.224 -52.738
4.4 -30.183 -54.019
4.4 -30.183 -53.223
Built 1995 4.4 -30.016 -53.710
Built before 1985 4.4 -30.036 -53.159
4.3 -29.740 -52.752
Built 1998 4.3 -29.994 -54.230
Built 1987 4.3 -30.471 -54.533
4.3 -30.308 -54.334
4.3 -29.816 -53.853
4.3 -30.161 -52.853
4.3 -30.169 -52.820
4.3 -30.226 -53.178
4.3 -29.866 -52.673
4.2 -30.077 -53.369
4.2 -30.095 -53.448
4.2 -30.147 -54.123
4.2 -30.119 -53.668
4.2 -30.146 -54.270
4.1 -30.033 -53.353
Built before 1985 4.1 -30.091 -53.649
4.1 -30.034 -53.207
4.1 -30.231 -52.525
4.1 -30.155 -54.115
4.0 -30.152 -52.398
Built before 1985 4.0 -30.047 -54.128
Built before 1985 3.9 -30.196 -52.508
Built 1993 3.9 -29.994 -54.198
3.9 -30.074 -53.415
3.9 -30.128 -52.569
3.9 -30.070 -52.052
3.9 -30.370 -53.155
3.9 -30.196 -54.221
3.9 -30.053 -53.597
3.8 -30.191 -52.497
Built before 1985 3.8 -29.811 -53.478
3.8 -30.558 -54.374
3.8 -30.212 -54.262
3.8 -29.906 -53.386
3.8 -30.097 -53.337
Built before 1985 3.8 -30.124 -54.153
3.7 -29.912 -53.546
3.7 -30.145 -53.763
3.7 -30.098 -54.063
3.7 -30.181 -53.178
3.7 -29.951 -52.715
3.7 -29.802 -53.753
3.7 -30.175 -52.482
3.6 -30.321 -54.250
3.6 -30.153 -53.523
3.6 -29.917 -52.838
Built before 1985 3.6 -30.169 -53.096
Built 2000 3.6 -30.039 -54.173
3.6 -29.849 -52.652
3.6 -29.804 -53.438
3.6 -30.191 -53.343
3.5 -30.007 -53.973
Built before 1985 3.5 -30.110 -52.566
3.5 -30.482 -54.465
3.5 -30.256 -53.187
3.5 -30.187 -52.840
3.5 -30.066 -53.836
3.5 -30.190 -52.485
3.5 -30.061 -53.054
3.5 -30.482 -54.528
Built 1997 3.5 -30.038 -53.505
3.4 -30.134 -54.266
3.4 -30.063 -52.644
3.4 -30.427 -53.076
3.4 -29.874 -53.686
3.4 -29.883 -53.720
3.3 -30.115 -53.876
3.3 -30.059 -53.683
3.3 -30.078 -53.794
3.3 -30.102 -53.319
3.3 -30.145 -52.809
3.3 -30.248 -54.206
Built before 1985 3.3 -29.881 -54.007
3.2 -29.747 -53.130
3.2 -30.055 -53.575
3.2 -30.499 -54.406
Built before 1985 3.2 -30.161 -53.232
3.2 -30.120 -53.256
3.2 -30.175 -54.037
3.2 -30.082 -54.158
3.2 -29.948 -50.809
3.2 -30.136 -53.662
3.1 -30.152 -53.691
Built 2001 3.1 -28.851 -53.696
3.1 -30.142 -52.787
3.1 -30.207 -52.211
Built 1998 3.0 -30.144 -53.361
3.0 -30.191 -53.261
Built before 1985 3.0 -29.816 -53.829
Built before 1985 3.0 -30.028 -53.586
3.0 -30.163 -54.168
2.9 -30.138 -54.044
2.9 -30.114 -53.644
2.9 -30.081 -52.625
2.9 -29.999 -53.257
2.9 -30.070 -54.124
2.9 -30.145 -53.482
2.8 -30.128 -53.814
2.8 -29.913 -53.305
2.8 -30.187 -54.199
2.8 -30.313 -54.395
2.8 -30.121 -53.078
Built 1993 2.8 -30.191 -52.461
2.8 -29.959 -52.766
2.8 -30.129 -52.696
2.8 -30.278 -52.837
2.7 -30.096 -53.471
2.7 -30.075 -54.024
2.7 -29.802 -52.038
2.7 -29.810 -52.937
2.7 -30.192 -54.320
2.7 -30.203 -53.263
2.7 -30.098 -53.637
Built 1989 2.7 -30.261 -53.446
2.7 -30.268 -52.665
2.7 -30.200 -52.887
2.7 -30.011 -53.253
2.7 -30.312 -54.342
2.6 -30.156 -52.595
Built 1988 2.6 -30.145 -53.370
2.6 -30.169 -53.212
2.6 -29.910 -53.064
Built 1994 2.6 -30.265 -54.099
Built before 1985 2.6 -30.076 -54.141
2.6 -30.002 -54.033
Built before 1985 2.6 -29.776 -53.833
Built before 1985 2.6 -30.188 -53.158
Built before 1985 2.6 -30.031 -53.515
2.6 -30.220 -52.556
2.6 -29.788 -52.901
2.5 -29.844 -53.923
2.5 -30.171 -54.337
Built 1989 2.5 -30.147 -53.775
2.5 -30.123 -52.106
2.5 -30.423 -54.433
2.5 -30.087 -52.084
Built before 1985 2.5 -30.045 -54.170
2.5 -30.181 -54.194
Built 2015 2.5 -28.611 -53.311
2.5 -29.819 -54.181
2.5 -29.773 -52.767
2.5 -29.740 -52.906
2.4 -30.044 -53.820
2.4 -30.360 -54.364
2.4 -30.019 -51.940
2.4 -30.077 -53.847
Built before 1985 2.4 -30.096 -54.161
2.4 -30.131 -53.504
2.4 -30.423 -54.308
Built before 1985 2.4 -29.853 -53.601
Built before 1985 2.4 -30.303 -54.160
2.3 -30.240 -52.819
Built 1995 2.3 -30.075 -54.085
2.3 -29.842 -53.641
Built 1987 2.3 -30.079 -53.121
Built before 1985 2.3 -30.248 -53.086
Built 2004 2.3 -29.345 -50.865
2.3 -30.276 -54.352
Built 1990 2.3 -28.779 -53.509
2.3 -30.122 -54.234
2.2 -30.361 -53.032
2.2 -30.183 -53.729
2.2 -30.132 -54.093
2.2 -30.026 -53.120
2.1 -30.088 -52.809
2.1 -30.103 -53.116
2.1 -30.290 -54.092
2.1 -29.864 -52.631
2.1 -29.877 -54.085
2.1 -30.395 -54.132
Built before 1985 2.1 -30.062 -54.078
2.0 -29.851 -52.669
2.0 -30.264 -53.203
2.0 -30.233 -54.283
2.0 -30.437 -54.251
2.0 -30.169 -53.178
Built 1988 2.0 -30.341 -54.143
Built 1988 2.0 -30.524 -54.403
2.0 -30.161 -53.377
2.0 -30.001 -54.058
2.0 -30.134 -53.119
Built 1995 2.0 -30.008 -53.571
2.0 -29.811 -53.511
2.0 -29.918 -54.003
2.0 -30.107 -53.418
2.0 -30.120 -53.416
2.0 -30.184 -53.267
Built 1995 1.9 -30.229 -52.705
1.9 -30.274 -54.175
1.9 -30.246 -54.100
1.9 -30.232 -53.386
1.9 -30.147 -53.428
1.8 -29.794 -53.748
Built before 1985 1.8 -30.078 -54.153
Built 1990 1.8 -30.369 -54.301
1.8 -30.114 -53.066
Built 1994 1.8 -30.056 -54.163
1.8 -29.944 -54.065
1.8 -30.220 -52.831
Built 1988 1.8 -30.444 -53.238
1.8 -30.113 -52.825
Built 1999 1.8 -30.124 -53.530
1.7 -30.252 -53.257
1.7 -30.047 -53.834
1.7 -30.045 -51.509
1.7 -29.745 -53.879
1.7 -29.770 -52.697
1.7 -29.833 -53.333
1.7 -29.936 -53.613
1.7 -29.875 -53.294
1.7 -29.837 -53.337
Built 2008 1.7 -28.872 -53.699
1.7 -30.202 -54.130
1.6 -29.853 -53.174
1.6 -30.386 -53.080
1.6 -30.142 -53.508
1.6 -30.047 -53.605
Built before 1985 1.6 -29.825 -53.815
1.6 -28.584 -53.429
1.6 -30.114 -53.464
1.6 -30.239 -53.241
Built 2013 1.6 -29.053 -53.119
1.5 -30.099 -54.122
1.5 -30.094 -52.115
1.5 -30.149 -53.474
Built 2013 1.5 -28.582 -53.453
1.4 -30.177 -53.680
1.4 -30.124 -53.402
1.4 -30.107 -51.647
1.4 -29.795 -53.132
1.3 -30.175 -53.136
Built 2015 1.3 -28.614 -53.402
1.3 -30.009 -53.664
1.3 -30.166 -53.461
1.3 -30.181 -52.226
1.3 -30.254 -52.863
1.2 -30.145 -53.528
Built 2003 1.2 -28.758 -53.582
1.2 -30.179 -52.875
1.2 -30.171 -53.446
Built before 1985 1.2 -30.172 -53.532
1.1 -29.827 -53.866
1.1 -30.141 -53.459
1.1 -30.121 -52.603
1.1 -29.956 -52.794
1.1 -29.849 -52.233
1.1 -30.074 -54.145
Built 2012 1.1 -28.865 -53.674
Built 1998 1.1 -30.394 -54.248
1.0 -30.166 -53.482
Built 1999 1.0 -30.037 -53.380
Built before 1985 1.0 -29.841 -53.602
1.0 -30.127 -53.090
1.0 -30.157 -53.428
1.0 -29.768 -52.734
0.9 -29.866 -52.691
0.8 -30.125 -53.639
Built before 1985 0.8 -30.168 -53.519
0.8 -30.120 -53.634
0.8 -30.146 -53.407
0.7 -30.167 -53.502
0.7 -29.727 -53.901
0.7 -30.257 -53.249
Built 1986 0.6 -30.056 -53.631
0.6 -29.780 -53.088
0.4 -30.165 -53.495

Dams serve many useful purposes including electric generation, water supply, irrigation, flood control, and recreation. However, if not carefully planned and managed, dams can have a heavy environmental impact. Today, many governments are removing dams to bring rivers back to life.

For a detailed look at the impact of dams on people and the environment, I encourage you to read the book Silenced Rivers by Patrick McCully. To help conserve free-flowing rivers, consider supporting the nonprofit International Rivers.

Data on dams comes from the Global Dam Watch database, published in July 2024. For more details, see the journal article by lead researchers at McGill University (Lehner et al. 2024).

Longest River

The longest river is the watershed is 769 km long. It is shown highlighted in the map in Figure 5 below.

This is the longest continuous flowline in the source dataset, MERIT-Basins. It is not necessarily the mainstem of the river, or the one with the same name. When it comes to naming rivers, historical, legal, and cultural influences are also important.

Figure 5. The longest river that flows to the watershed outlet (highlighted).

Figure 6 shows the elevation profile of the longest river reach. Elevations on the plot are in meters above mean sea level. The river begins at 642 m, and the outlet is at 0 m.

🖱️Mouse wheel to zoom Click & drag to pan 📱Pinch to zoom on mobile

Figure 6. Elevation profile of the longest river reach.

Elevation data for the profile plot is from MERIT-DEM (Yamazaki et al. 2017). Actual distances on the plot may be underestimated somewhat. This is because river paths are based on a grid or raster data, which simplifies the meandering path of real-world rivers.

Topography

Terrain elevations in the watershed range from 0 m to 1,200 m above sea level. The average, or mean, elevation is 370 m. Figure 7 shows a distribution of terrain elevations in the watershed.

Figure 7. Distribution of terrain elevations in the watershed.
Scale for x-axis: Linear   Log

Elevation data is provided by EarthEnv (Amatulli et al. 2021), and is based on the Global Multi-resolution Terrain Elevation Data 2010 dataset (GMTED2010). Statistics are based on gridded elevation data with pixels that are about 1 km on a side. Because of the size of the pixels, some smoothing takes place, and so the statistics reported above may not capture the true minimum and maximum elevation.

Endangered Species

The watershed is home to 73 threatened freshwater species. Table 5 shows the species that are endangered, vulnerable, or near-threatened, based on assessments by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature, or IUCN. Data comes from the IUCN Red List.

For a photo of the species, hover the mouse over Scientific Name in the table, or tap on mobile. Click the link under Status to view the IUCN assessment. Here you can find out more about the reasons the species decline, view maps of the species distribution, and read about any conservation measures being taken.

Table 5. Threatened species in the watershed.

Type Scientific Name Common Name Status Presence
amphibians Melanophryniscus cambaraensis Brazilian Redbelly Toad Critically Endangered ⧉ Possibly Extinct
fish Pristis pristis Largetooth Sawfish Critically Endangered ⧉ Presence Uncertain
fish Garcialebias bagual Unknown Critically Endangered ⧉ Extant
amphibians Cycloramphus valae Gruta Button Frog Critically Endangered ⧉ Possibly Extinct
amphibians Melanophryniscus admirabilis Admirable-Redbelly-toad Critically Endangered ⧉ Extant
birds Mergus octosetaceus Brazilian Merganser Critically Endangered ⧉ Possibly Extinct
birds Xanthopsar flavus Saffron-cowled Blackbird Endangered ⧉ Extant
fish Matilebias camaquensis Unknown Endangered ⧉ Extant
fish Matilebias ibicuiensis Peixe-anual Endangered ⧉ Extant
fish Diapoma pyrrhopteryx Lambari Endangered ⧉ Extant
fish Odontesthes bicudo Peixe-rei-bicudo Endangered ⧉ Extant
fish Jenynsia sanctaecatarinae Unknown Endangered ⧉ Extant
fish Steindachneridion punctatum Unknown Endangered ⧉ Extant
fish Cambeva tropeiro Cambeva Endangered ⧉ Extant
fish Matilebias cyaneus Peixe-anual Endangered ⧉ Extant
amphibians Elachistocleis erythrogaster Red-bellied cricket frog Endangered ⧉ Extant
fish Garcialebias adloffi Peixe-anual Endangered ⧉ Extant
fish Steindachneridion scriptum Bocudo Endangered ⧉ Extant
birds Pipile jacutinga Black-fronted Piping-guan Endangered ⧉ Possibly Extinct
amphibians Melanophryniscus macrogranulosus Torres Redbelly Toad Endangered ⧉ Extant
fish Bryconamericus lambari Lambari Endangered ⧉ Extant
fish Lupinoblennius paivai Paiva’s Blenny Endangered ⧉ Extant
fish Amatolebias varzeae Peixe-anual Vulnerable ⧉ Extant
mammals Blastocerus dichotomus Marsh Deer Vulnerable ⧉ Possibly Extinct
birds Limosa haemastica Hudsonian Godwit Vulnerable ⧉ Extant
birds Sporophila cinnamomea Chestnut Seedeater Vulnerable ⧉ Extant
fish Cynopoecilus intimus Peixe-anual Vulnerable ⧉ Extant
fish Matilebias litzi Peixe-anual Vulnerable ⧉ Extant
mammals Tapirus terrestris Lowland Tapir Vulnerable ⧉ Extinct
birds Pluvialis squatarola Grey Plover Vulnerable ⧉ Extant
birds Calidris fuscicollis White-rumped Sandpiper Vulnerable ⧉ Extant
fish Gymnotus refugio Unknown Vulnerable ⧉ Possibly Extant
fish Crenicichla hadrostigma Joana Vulnerable ⧉ Extant
reptiles Phrynops williamsi Williams’ Side-necked Turtle Vulnerable ⧉ Extant
fish Carcharhinus leucas Bull Shark Vulnerable ⧉ Extant
fish Matilebias paucisquama Peixe-anual Vulnerable ⧉ Extant
fish Cynopoecilus notabilis Unknown Vulnerable ⧉ Extant
fish Crenicichla empheres Joana Vulnerable ⧉ Extant
birds Xolmis dominicanus Black-and-white Monjita Vulnerable ⧉ Extant
fish Hollandichthys taramandahy Lambari-listrado Vulnerable ⧉ Extant
birds Tringa flavipes Lesser Yellowlegs Vulnerable ⧉ Extant
birds Scytalopus iraiensis Marsh Tapaculo Vulnerable ⧉ Extant
birds Sporophila melanogaster Black-bellied Seedeater Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
fish Crenicichla jurubi Joaninha Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
fish Odontesthes piquava Peixe-rei Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
fish Gymnotus chimarrao Carapo Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
fish Cynopoecilus fulgens Peixe-anual Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
mammals Lontra longicaudis Neotropical Otter Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
fish Lepthoplosternum tordilho Laguunihaarniskamonni Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
birds Limnoctites rectirostris Straight-billed Reedhaunter Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
birds Calidris pusilla Semipalmated Sandpiper Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
fish Scleronema operculatum Unknown Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
fish Pareiorhaphis cameroni Unknown Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
fish Astyanax cremnobates Lambari-de-cabeceira Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
birds Arenaria interpres Ruddy Turnstone Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
fish Cynopoecilus nigrovittatus Peixe-anual Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
birds Laterallus spilopterus Dot-winged Crake Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
birds Calidris himantopus Stilt Sandpiper Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
birds Nycticryphes semicollaris South American Painted-snipe Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
fish Astyanax brachypterygium Lambari-de-cabeceira Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
fish Hisonotus megaloplax Cascudinho Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
fish Mimagoniates rheocharis Lambari-azul Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
fish Zungaro jahu Manguruyu Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
fish Pseudoplatystoma corruscans Spotted Sorubim Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
fish Cambeva perkos Unknown Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
fish Gymnogeophagus lacustris Face Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
fish Diapoma thauma Lambari Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
fish Diapoma tipiaia Unknown Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
birds Sporophila ruficollis Dark-throated Seedeater Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
birds Tringa melanoleuca Greater Yellowlegs Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
birds Calidris canutus Red Knot Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
birds Phoenicopterus chilensis Chilean Flamingo Near Threatened ⧉ Extant
crayfish Parastacus brasiliensis Unknown Near Threatened ⧉ Extant

The presence of endangered species in a watershed provides important information about ecosystem health and biodiversity. Many factors can threaten endangered species within watersheds:

Water management plays an important role in protecting endangered species. This includes maintaining adequate streamflows, protecting riparian zones and wetlands, controlling pollution sources, and preserving habitat connectivity throughout the watershed.

What Can I Do?

If you're concerned about endangered species in your watershed, there are many ways you can help. Support organizations working on species conservation and habitat protection, or local watershed councils and land trusts in your area. Many watersheds have dedicated conservation groups focused on protecting local rivers, wetlands, and wildlife. Search for [your watershed name] + "conservation," "river keeper," or "watershed association."

You can also take direct action in your community. Participate in river cleanups, plant native vegetation along stream banks, reduce pesticide and fertilizer use, and support land use policies that protect riparian corridors and wetlands.

If you own property near streams or wetlands, consider conservation easements through organizations like the Land Trust Alliance.

Report wildlife sightings to citizen science platforms like iNaturalist or eBird. Your observations can contribute to scientific understanding and conservation planning. Finally, use your voice: contact local officials to support clean water regulations, habitat protection, and sustainable development practices that consider watershed health and wildlife needs.

References

Amatulli, G., Domisch, S., Tuanmu, M.-N., Parmentier, B., Ranipeta, A., Malczyk, J., & Jetz, W. (2018). A suite of global, cross-scale topographic variables for environmental and biodiversity modeling. Scientific Data, 5(1), 180040. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.40

Fick, S.E., and R.J. Hijmans. 2017. “WorldClim 2: New 1‐km Spatial Resolution Climate Surfaces for Global Land Areas.” International Journal of Climatology 37 (12): 4302–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5086

Harris, I., Osborn, T.J., Jones, P. et al. Version 4 of the CRU TS monthly high-resolution gridded multivariate climate dataset. Scientific Data 7, 109 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0453-3

The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. (n.d.). IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. https://www.iucnredlist.org

Lehner, B., Beames, P., Mulligan, M. et al. The Global Dam Watch database of river barrier and reservoir information for large-scale applications. Scientific Data 11, 1069 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-03752-9

Liu, L., X. Cao, S. Li, and N. Jie. “A 31-Year (1990–2020) Global Gridded Population Dataset Generated by Cluster Analysis and Statistical Learning.” Scientific Data 11, no. 1 (January 24, 2024): 124. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-02913-0

Martens, B., Miralles, D.G., Lievens, H., van der Schalie, R., de Jeu, R.A.M., Fernández-Prieto, D., Beck, H.E., Dorigo, W.A., and Verhoest, N.E.C. 2017. GLEAM v3: satellite-based land evaporation and root-zone soil moisture, Geoscientific Model Development, 10, 1903–1925. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-1903-2017

Miralles, D.G., Holmes, T.R.H., de Jeu, R.A.M., Gash, J.H., Meesters, A.G.C.A., Dolman, A.J. 2011. Global land-surface evaporation estimated from satellite-based observations, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15, 453–469. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-453-2011

Potapov P., Hansen M.C., Pickens A., Hernandez-Serna A., Tyukavina A., Turubanova S., Zalles V., Li X., Khan A., Stolle F., Harris N., Song X.-P., Baggett A., Kommareddy I., Kommareddy A. (2022) The global 2000-2020 land cover and land use change dataset derived from the Landsat archive: first results. Frontiers in Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsen.2022.856903

Save, H., S. Bettadpur, and B.D. Tapley (2016), High resolution CSR GRACE RL05 mascons, Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth, 121. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JB013007

Save, H., 2020, "CSR GRACE and GRACE-FO RL06 Mascon Solutions v02." https://doi.org/10.15781/cgq9-nh24

Siebert, S., M. Kummu, M. Porkka, P. Döll, N. Ramankutty, and B. R. Scanlon. “A Global Data Set of the Extent of Irrigated Land from 1900 to 2005.” Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 19, no. 3 (March 25, 2015): 1521–45. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-1521-2015.

Yamazaki, D., D. Ikeshima, R. Tawatari, T. Yamaguchi, F. O’Loughlin, J.C. Neal, C.C. Sampson, S. Kanae, & P.D. Bates. (2017). A high‐accuracy map of global terrain elevations. Geophysical Research Letters, 44, 5844–5853. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017GL072874.